header bg

Question:

Which statement best summarizes the author’s argument?

A Capitalism is good for economic growth, but the government should intervene to ensure wealth is distributed fairly.
Explaination

Both capitalism and socialism should be replaced with a better system. The best summary of the position the author is taking is (Capitalism is good for economic growth, but the government should intervene to ensure wealth is distributed fairly). Answer (Socialism should replace capitalism so wealth is more equitably distributed) goes further than the author, who says only that the government should intervene to regulate a capitalistic system so the wealth doesn’t disproportionately go to the rich.